|
JFN会員広場というメーリングリストに知人の投稿がありました。「ニューヨーク・タイムズ紙8月9日付記事は福島発です。政府の<情報公開の遅れ>を指摘しています。かなり長文の記事ですが、平易な英語です。本メールにオンライン版の記事(8月8日付)のURLを添付します。オンライン版のほうが先に出るというのも面白いものですね」と。
ざっと読み終えて翻訳を思い立ち、出来上がりを2011年お盆の記念としてここに掲載します。
4ページに分け、各ページとも前半がNew York Timesの原文、後半が私の翻訳です。ご興味ある方はどちらでもお読みください。 |
|
|
|
New York Times (Internet), August 9, 2011 |
|
Japan Held Nuclear Data,
Leaving Evacuees in Peril
(Page 1 of 4) |
|
FUKUSHIMA, Japan - The day after a giant tsunami set off the continuing
disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, thousands of residents
at the nearby town of Namie gathered to evacuate.
Given no guidance from Tokyo, town officials led the residents north, believing
that winter winds would be blowing south and carrying away any radioactive
emissions. For three nights, while hydrogen explosions at four of the reactors
spewed radiation into the air, they stayed in a district called Tsushima
where the children played outside and some parents used water from a mountain
stream to prepare rice.
The winds, in fact, had been blowing directly toward Tsushima — and town officials would learn two months later that a government computer system designed to predict the spread of radioactive releases had been showing just that.
But the forecasts were left unpublicized by bureaucrats in Tokyo, operating in a culture that sought to avoid responsibility and, above all, criticism. Japan’s political leaders at first did not know about the system and later played down the data, apparently fearful of having to significantly enlarge the evacuation zone — and acknowledge the accident’s severity.
“From the 12th to the 15th we were in a location with one of the highest levels of radiation,” said Tamotsu Baba, the mayor of Namie, which is about five miles from the nuclear plant. He and thousands from Namie now live in temporary housing in another town, Nihonmatsu. “We are extremely worried about internal exposure to radiation.”
The withholding of information, he said, was akin to “murder.”
In interviews and public statements, some current and former government officials have admitted that Japanese authorities engaged in a pattern of withholding damaging information and denying facts of the nuclear disaster — in order, some of them said, to limit the size of costly and disruptive evacuations in land-scarce Japan and to avoid public questioning of the politically powerful nuclear industry. As the nuclear plant continues to release radiation, some of which has slipped into the nation’s food supply, public anger is growing at what many here see as an official campaign to play down the scope of the accident and the potential health risks.
Seiki Soramoto, a lawmaker and former nuclear engineer to whom Prime Minister
Naoto Kan turned for advice during the crisis, blamed the government for
withholding forecasts from the computer system, known as the System for
Prediction of Environmental Emergency Dose Information, or Speedi.
“In the end, it was the prime minister’s office that hid the Speedi data,” he said. “Because they didn’t have the knowledge to know what the data meant, and thus they did not know what to say to the public, they thought only of their own safety, and decided it was easier just not to announce it.”
In an interview, Goshi Hosono, the minister in charge of the nuclear crisis, dismissed accusations that political considerations had delayed the release of the early Speedi data. He said that they were not disclosed because they were incomplete and inaccurate, and that he was presented with the data for the first time only on March 23.
“And on that day, we made them public,” said Mr. Hosono, who was one of the prime minister’s closest advisers in the early days of the crisis before being named nuclear disaster minister. “As for before that, I myself am not sure. In the days before that, which were a matter of life and death for Japan as a nation, I wasn’t taking part in what was happening with Speedi.”
The computer forecasts were among many pieces of information the authorities initially withheld from the public.
Meltdowns at three of Fukushima Daiichi’s six reactors went officially
unacknowledged for months. In one of the most damning admissions, nuclear
regulators said in early June that inspectors had found tellurium 132,
which experts call telltale evidence of reactor meltdowns, a day after
the tsunami — but did not tell the public for nearly three months. For
months after the disaster, the government flip-flopped on the level of
radiation permissible on school grounds, causing continuing confusion and
anguish about the safety of schoolchildren here in Fukushima. |
|
|
|
|
|